Hi Jochen, Have you confirmed darktable is actually running GPU acceleration? e.g. looking at the logs of darktable (e.g. using arguments: -d opencl -d perf)? I ran benchmarks on my computer with a 121MB RAW file (download of a Fuji GFX100 DNG) with 17 modules active and that takes 34sec to export, on an eGPU "AMD Radeon Pro 580 Compute Engine 8192 MB" which is performance wise in the ballpark region of your card. egpu attached to a MacBook Pro, 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB ram. Since I doubt you have more than 17 modules active and a faster desktop machine I suspect your 1 minute time is caused by something else than your GPU.
hth mike Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 11:51 Uhr schrieb Jochen Keil < [email protected]>: > Dear all, > > two years ago I bought a "Palit GTX1060 Super Jetstream 6GB. PCIE 3.0 / > 6GB DDR5 192bit 8.0GHz / 1847MHz / 1280 Cuda Cores" specifically for the > task of editing pictures in darktable. > > In the meantime I upgraded various other components (RAM, CPU) but > overall, it still takes about a minute to export a picture (~80MB RAW -> > 16bit TIFF). Additionally, editing can get pretty slow with many modules > applied. > > Will upgrading to a newer GFX give me a significant performance boost? Any > GFX recommendations for that purpose? > > Thank you very much and best wishes, > > Jochen > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
