I agree, except I would really urge the developers (from a humble
position and very grateful for what they have accomplished so far) to
not forget improvements on image quality! 'Priority on image editing' is
good, but image quality is final. I don't really like LR, but I'm using
it anyway because it gives me better results (sharpness, detail,
highlight recovery). Really, I compared them over and over again ;).
Op 27-06-2020 om 14:03 schreef Jean-Luc CECCOLI:
Message du 26/06/20 22:55
De : "Willy Williams"
A : [email protected]
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [darktable-user] Turning Darktable into a file manager
If I were to prioritize darktable for either image editing or digital asset
management, I'd choose image editing and manually place files in locations
where they make sense to me to be. It the developers could do both, great, but
keep the priority on image editing. One thing that really irritates me about
Lightroom is that Adobe pretty much dictates how one should manage their own
files. I'll choose my own structure and process for digital asset management
and to hell with Adobe.
+1.
This is sensible.
There are many tools that can deal with file management, let them do their job
and let dt do what it does the best.
And bear in mind that if you force someone to do something he does not believe
in, it may not be what it ought have been.
Rgrds,
J.-Luc
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
