Tagging and search capabilities in darktable are excellent. In case if it's not clear, tags can be hierarchical like family|person and you can search either by family or by person.

While it's not easily apparent, collections in lighttable is very powerful. It allows you to do searches what would amount SQL's "and" and "or" operations. It also allows you to filter based on date, location.

So you can easily search for images taken by my X camera with lens Y and having ISO blah - just as an example.

While I don't have half a million images in my collection, I do maintain what I consider a sizeable collection. After I went through tagging and geotagging exercise I've never faced any issues locating the images I want.

I still have following items in my wishlist though. It could be there, but I have not explored it enough. There is a custom sort option, but have not spent time to see what it does.

 * Filtering the current view based on some other criteria apart from
   ratings and rejected. It's pain to keep adjusting collection, but
   similar functionality can be achieved.
 * Sorting by multiple fields. For a family tree like Grand Father |
   Children | Grand children, sometimes I have a need to sort by
   children and then grand children to keep each family together.

Regards,


Niranjan

On 10/8/21 1:30 PM, Terry Pinfold wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
       now I realise you are on the Windows environment like myself. I will mention it is possible to download Adobe's Bridge program free of charge and it might be worth a look. I have Adobe's Lightroom  perpetual and subscription licenses. I do love LR's catalog system and I would cringe at the thought of asking it to handle 500,000 images in a single database. I would divide my images into different catalogs for speed and easy to find what I want. 500,000 images in any single catalog sounds a challenge for the program because the database would be so bloated.

Despite having a comprehensive suite of programs from Adobe. Maybe all of them. I defer to DT for my editing. It is so much more fun and capable. Occasionally I have to use GIMP as well because even DT can not do everything. I have recently started using the color balance rgb module by employing the 'add basic colorfulness' preset found in the hamburger. Again someone on the list suggested this so I tried it. This adds colorfulness to my images to give results more comparable to other programs (not that I am advocating comparing programs). It has made me explore this module further and I am learning to work vibrance, saturation, chroma and brilliance based upon separate adjustments to the shadows, midtones and highlights. I am just being continually blown away by the editing capabilities of DT compared to Lightroom.

This thread has made me look more at the capabilities of the lightttable in DT. I am impressed at the improvements I am seeing here. Yesterday I explored the tagging module following the suggestion by Patrick and was pleasantly surprised how it would find images based on keywords (tags in DT speak). I could then right click on the keyword and have a collection of photos display in the lighttable grid. This is showing me that DT is far more capable at organising and finding photos than I realised. Once again well done to the developers. I will continue to explore the capabilities of lighttable as I get the chance. I am hoping I can use it to synchronise my various backup hard drives for images. At this point of time I use LR solely for this reason because it is very capable of doing that taska dn I am used to the program, but maybe in time I may come to realise that DT could also do. But I would not ask the developers to bloat DT to try and match LR. The number one priority for DT should remain editing. DT also edits JPG and Tiff files, but of course editing RAW files is the best option in any program.

cheers,
     Terry

On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 06:53, Lorenzo Fontanella <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Good evening everyone.
    Thank you very much for many answers and for sharing your point of
    view that I share.
    For sure I'll continue to use an image organizer as a selection
    base and I'll configure it (good suggestion) in such a way that it
    opens directly the files in DT.
    Now I use XnView MP in Windows environment, but I will see if I
    can find better, although I don't think so.
    Grazie Maurizio, for recommending Digikam, but it's not for me
    considering that for better or worse it always requires importing
    into a database and I don't like that.

    To understand:
    my philosophy is to manage the amount of data according to a
    criterion based on names and codes given to the folders and store
    iptc data (keyword) inside the jpeg files so that now as in the
    future, with any software and on any platform I can find
    everything with the same criterion; and everything is disconnected
    from a central database or software.

    Anyway.... yes DarkTable is slightly slow in the process of
    displaying and "browsing" files AFTER importing the entire my archive.
    So I guess I will try to import only small pieces as needed.

    I also read among your replies that I was advised by Guillermo to
    "ignore" the DB generation, did I understand correctly?
    I don't understand how it works and how to do it.



    Thank you and I'm happy that you have replied many, this indicates
    that the community is structured.
    with gratitude

    LorenzoFontanella
    http://www.lorenzofontanella.it <http://www.lorenzofontanella.it>

    Il giorno ven 8 ott 2021 alle ore 11:35 Terry Pinfold
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:

        Yes, that's it. Works well

        On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, 5:39 pm Bernhard,
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            this one? see attached

            Terry Pinfold schrieb am 08.10.21 um 01:51:
            > Hi Patrick,
            >        thanks for that great suggestion. The tagging
            module in lighttable
            > shows my keywords and by right clicking on the tag I can
            'go to tag
            > collection'. This is precisely what I wanted.
            >                          Terry
            >
            >
            >
            > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 10:33, Patrick Shanahan
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
            >
            >> * Terry Pinfold <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> [10-07-21 17:56]:
            >>>
            >>> Number one for me is DT's abilty to edit. Any ability
            to search for and
            >> find my images through lighttable is a bonus. But this
            should never be at
            >> the cost of making DT a bloated program. I wonder if it
            would be possible
            >> to improve the sort by funtionality of DT to include
            keywords. I am not a
            >> developer so I don't understand what is easy and
            practical to impliment.
            >>                    Terry
            >>

--
            regards
            Bernhard

            https://www.bilddateien.de <https://www.bilddateien.de>


        
____________________________________________________________________________
        darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:darktable-user%[email protected]>


    ____________________________________________________________________________
    darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:darktable-user%[email protected]>



--


____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]



____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to