Hi,
were the original and all the duplicates present in the database before
making the duplicate?
Regards,
Guillermo

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:57 AM Dusenberg <dusenb...@gmx.co.uk> wrote:

> Originally posted to darktable-dev list in error.
>
> dt 4.2.1 (OBS), Linux Mint 21,Ubuntu 22.04 jammy
>
> I have an image from March 2020 developed in darktable. I went back to it
> today to try another edit on it (its a monochrome rendition that I just
> can't get 'right').
>
> However, today when I created a duplicate of this 2020 image in dt 4.2.1,
> it was given version number '3' - which already exists for that image
> (there are seven pre-existing duplicates).  I see that dt has also given
> the new duplicate a different 'image id' to the original RAW image. I've
> never seen this before, although its not often I go back in time like this.
>
> My workflow is that I always create a new version (duplicate) of the base
> RAW for a different edit so I can trace back any final output that may
> result. My filenaming system is '<filename>_<version
> number>_<colorspace>_<max size>' where filename is composed of
> '<YYYYMMDD_projectname_original camera filename>'.  Original camera images
> are renamed during download onto my workstation via a bespoke script (ie
> outside dt).  I use variables in the dt export module to ensure any output
> follows this format.  This provides unique identification of every image
> and its derivatives across my libraries, even when intermediate tiffs are
> involved in say, focus stacks.
>
> This is critical for me - I can't have two different edits of a RAW with
> the same filename!  Why has it happened and what can I do about it?
>
> Thanks
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>

____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to