On 06/10/13 14:37, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote: > > > > 2013/10/6 Ochal Christophe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > That makes sense, the thing is, the embedded jpeg has much better > white balance than what I can achieve, partly because I have no clue > what I'm doing. It would be nice if I could figure out how the > camera did it. > > > Have you looked at exiv2 documentation? The white balance should be > available somewhere in the EXIF of your JPEG file.
Shouldn't choosing the preset 'camera white balance' do the same as what the camera did for the jpegs? I guess the OP has tried that without success. Regards, Tony. -- Tony Arnold, Tel: +44 (0) 161 275 6093 Head of IT Security, Fax: +44 (0) 705 344 3082 University of Manchester, Mob: +44 (0) 773 330 0039 Manchester M13 9PL. Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
