On 2014-05-21 09:47, Roman Lebedev wrote: >> But then I discovered why: the "paste" apply the correction with > the>focal lenght of photo1... so it is wrong for most of the other > photos! > >Is this normal? > > Yes, that is not a bug. > The bug is that your lens wasn't properly detected by exiv2.
Yes, I will report a bug as soon as I get around to do it. > >> But in my case I have to manually choose the lens --- so this will > not > apply, correct? > ATM it is correct. > But that is still not a bug, merely unimplemented functionality. Yes, I agree. The following thing is basically a proposal for better interface --- I think that it will be more intuitive that way (but I understand this is just my opinion, YMMV). >> I have not seen the 1.5 implementation, but my suggestion is that the >> (subset) of parameters in a module that could be auto-applied (in the >> case of the exposure, is just one; in the case of the lens correction, >> there are two or even three sets - lens type, geometry, TCA) should >> have >> an "auto" tick; when ticked, the parameters are grayed out and >> automatically recalculated on paste. It's IMHO clean and intuitive. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
