Hi, Am Sa 24 Jan 2015 11:39:19 CET schrieb David Vincent-Jones <david...@gmail.com>:
> My first stop is to enable the profiled-denoise; I find this does > quite a good job if I have not had to 'pull' the data heavily. As a > second step, if needed, I then use a very small value of raw-denoise. > > I am finding that I only need to use the local-means and > bilateral-filter if my initial exposure was badly misplaced or I have > been heavy handed with correction. My last message was misleading: I am talking about the profiled denoise module. The module has two elements, a non-local means mode (default) and a wavelet denoise mode (which I prefer for color noise). Cheers Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
