If profiled denoise fails me, I always turn to the great equalizer
module to slay the noise dragon.

Jack


On 2015-01-24 12:01 PM, Michael Below wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sa 24 Jan 2015 11:39:19 CET
> schrieb David Vincent-Jones <[email protected]>:
>
>> My first stop is to enable the profiled-denoise; I find this does
>> quite a good job if I have not had to 'pull' the data heavily. As a
>> second step, if needed, I then use a very small value of raw-denoise.
>>
>> I am finding that I only need to use the local-means and
>> bilateral-filter if my initial exposure was badly misplaced or I have
>> been heavy handed with correction.
>
> My last message was misleading: I am talking about the profiled denoise
> module. The module has two elements, a non-local means mode (default)
> and a wavelet denoise mode (which I prefer for color noise).
>
> Cheers
>    Michael
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to