Christian Mandel <c.man...@gmx.net> writes:

> * I tried both, start with 3 or 0 stars for every picture and then go 
> through the pictures and change that initial rating.

I personnally start with 0, which for me means "unrated". Then, either I
find the image reasonably good and it deserves at least one star, or I
don't and I reject it ("rejected" means for me "I'll probably nevel look
at it again, and I may delete it after a while if I need space on my
hard disk).

It's easy to filter 0-stars only images to see what's unrated (aka "the
todolist").

> * I use the color marks for the development status red=nothing done but 
> want to edit, yellow=already treated but not finished or not satisfied 
> and green=done

I use the darktable|exported tag for this :

* not rejected and not exported = I have to deal with this image later

* exported = I consider my work finished for this image, at least
  temporarily.

I don't trust RAW for really long-term storage so I export all my
pictures when I'm statisfied with them anyway.

There's also a darktable|changed tag set automatically, so
"darktable|changed and not darktable|exported" tells you the ongoing
work.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to