Sorry about that. I must have grabbed it at the wrong time while I was experimenting. I did see "denoiseprofile" in the xmp previously. Does Darktable write the xmp with every change you make?
You were right to wonder about the filmstrip. If I only switch images via the lighttable everything looks right. Re-exporting the images after avoiding the filstrip, I don't see much of a difference visually. However, the jpeg files have gotten a lot smaller. Also, looking more closely, the jpegs do seem to have _some_ denoising applied. They are clearer than what I see in the darkroom with denoising turned off, but not as clear as what I see in the darkroom with it turned on. Maybe that is a separate issue. Given the feature freeze for 2.0, is the git master relatively stable? Does it expect newer versions of any of the libraries Darktable depends on? Thanks, -- Scott On Sun, Oct 18, 2015, at 09:50 AM, johannes hanika wrote: > hm, switching the image in filmstrip forth and back works for me (but > i'm on git master). the xmp you sent doesn't contain a denoising entry > though. > > jo > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:25 AM, johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > hi, > > > > okay, does that still happen if you don't use the filmstrip but go > > back to lighttable instead? i haven't used 1.6.x in a while (but > > master instead). we've had a few bugs regarding film strip switching > > that eventually got fixed, not sure the 1.6 series is affected by > > that. > > > > will try to reproduce with your raw, thanks for the test case. > > > > -jo > > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Scott V McGuire > > <scottvmcgu...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I will attach a sample in a separate message to you directly to avoid > >> the lists attachment size limit. (Is there a better way to share the > >> samples?) > >> > >> Mainly I see this purely in Darktable's darkroom, with no zoom. As in > >> > >> 1. Open image in darkroom > >> 2. Switch on "denoise (profiled)" with default settings > >> 3. Note that image is much improved > >> 4. Switch to some other image via the filmstrip > >> 5. Switch back to original image via the filmstrip > >> 6. Note that effect of denoise is gone but it is still marked active. > >> > >> My exported jpegs look mostly like the output of step 6 and not 3. I've > >> looked at them in GPicView and in Firefox after uploading to SmugMug. > >> > >> This may be relevant. This was applied via a preset I created. > >> > >> Thanks for the attention. > >> > >> -- > >> Scott > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015, at 05:45 AM, johannes hanika wrote: > >>> heya, > >>> > >>> can you supply an xmp or maybe even a test raw file so we can try and > >>> reproduce? also how are you looking at the image? full zoom 1:1 in > >>> darkroom mode? which external viewer at which zoom level? what are > >>> your settings for interpolation in darktable (lanczos filter or > >>> simpler?)? > >>> > >>> -jo > >>> > >>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Scott V McGuire > >>> <scottvmcgu...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >>> > Hello All, > >>> > > >>> > I am just learning about processing raw files in general and how to do > >>> > it in Darktable in particular. I'm very happy with the results for a > >>> > lot of my pictures and would like to thank the developers for making > >>> > this excellent software. > >>> > > >>> > Unfortunately I am having a problem with the pictures which obviously > >>> > need noise reduction. When I click to apply "denoise (profiled)" the > >>> > results look good. However, if I leave the image and then return to it > >>> > the noise is back though I still see "denoise (profiled)" as active in > >>> > the history. The noise is also there when I export the pictures. If I > >>> > deactivate/reactivate the module or reset the parameters the picture > >>> > clears up again, but this is still only temporary. As an experiment I > >>> > tried adding "denoise (bilateral filter)" and see the same results. > >>> > > >>> > I am running Debian stable but with Darktable, exiv2, and lensfun built > >>> > from source because I could not get my camera and lens to be recognized > >>> > with the prebuilt packages. I built from > >>> > * darktable-release-1.6.8.tar.gz > >>> > * exiv2-0.25.tar.gz > >>> > * lensfun-0.3.1.tar.gz > >>> > and my camera is a Sony A6000 using the kit lens > >>> > * ILCE-6000 > >>> > * E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS. > >>> > I have tried with and without OpenCL and saw no difference. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Is there something obvious that I could be doing wrong? Please let me > >>> > know if there is some other information I can supply. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Scott > >>> > > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Darktable-users mailing list > >>> > Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Darktable-users mailing list > >>> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Darktable-users mailing list > >> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
