I have finally upgraded to DT2 and I find it slow, much slower than
DT 1.6.9. Same system, no change. Most images are Canon CR2, but 30%
are Fuji X-trans RAF.

What used to be almost instantaneous now takes a few seconds.
Exporting jpegs was under 2 seconds per jpeg when doing a group, now
it's almost 10 seconds.

Changing the exposure with the "bent line/right click" used to be
instantaneous, now it takes a couple of seconds...

Same with most other operations. 

DT2 is NOT slow as molasses, but it's so much slower when compared
with DT 1.6.9.

It was much slower, then I run "darktable-generate-cache" it became
faster, then  "darktable-generate-cache -m 7" with made it a little
bit faster, but it's still so much slower than DT1.6.9.

What can I do to improve...?

OpenCL:

[opencl_init] kernel loading time: 0.0158 
[opencl_init] OpenCL successfully initialized.
[opencl_init] here are the internal numbers and names of OpenCL
devices available to darktable:
[opencl_init]           0       'GeForce GTX 650 Ti'
[opencl_init] these are your device priorities:
[opencl_init]           image   preview export
thumbnail
[opencl_init]           0       -1      0       0
[opencl_init] FINALLY: opencl is AVAILABLE on this system.

Memory: 12Gb

free
              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache available
Mem:          11991        1036        2825          37 8129 10828
Swap:          5995           0        5995

-- 
sknahT

vyS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to