Hi, I'm just going through darktable's 2.x configuration settings.
It seems that over time that the hdd-thumbnail cache may take up quite a bit of storage space, which doesn't really matter nowadays with TB-hdds and caching the thumbnails is in my opinion a great idea. The question is whether thumbnails are worth to be included in backups, which take up time, and that to decide would be nice for the user. I, for example, wouldn't care and preferred an option to direct the thumbnails to some hdd- or even SSD space. There is some which I usually don't bother to backup. In short: What about including an option for redirecting the thumbnail cache to a user selected location? cu Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
