On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:22:40 +0100 Ulrich Pegelow <ulrich.pege...@tongareva.de> wrote:
>Hi, > >without any profiling data - just with the "feeling" value there >won't be any help for you. > >You need to identify a typical use situation where darktable 2.0 >"feels" slower than 1.6.9. Then you need to reproducably measure the >timings with '-d perf' (or '-d opencl -d perf') once for 2.0 and >then for 1.6.9. Thanks, but I've already removed 1.6.9. So I can't do a number comparison. -- sknahT vyS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
