* Girts Gailans <gi...@gailans.com> [01-20-16 13:21]: > In the past, my workflow was to process an image in DT then upload it to my > website, where it would need to be re-named and filed safely. Once I was > sure everything was OK, I would return to DT and remove the image. Now, I > find DT will not remove its image if the original has been moved or > re-named. It needs the original to be there for it to refer to so it can > delete it. For me, this means I have to remove it before I'm certain > everything is as it should be. I don't like it, but that's the way it's been > done. Was this change intentional or accidental?
afaik, this has been dt's action for several years. I don't know how you were able to do different, "in the past". I would suggest that your workflow has changed or you are mistaken. The finished product's location after dt's export is not retained by dt so should not affect you using dt to remove the "original". Why do you think the original has been or is being moved? Aren't you putting the product or exported image on your website rather than the original? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
