Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016, 18:19:54 schrieb Girts Gailans: > In the past, my workflow was to process an image in DT then upload it to > my website, where it would need to be re-named and filed safely. Once I
You are renaming the far/server copy of the exported image here? > was sure everything was OK, I would return to DT and remove the image. You are removing the original raw from dt here? > Now, I find DT will not remove its image if the original has been moved > or re-named. It needs the original to be there for it to refer to so it Did you also rename the local raw file? > can delete it. For me, this means I have to remove it before I'm certain > everything is as it should be. I don't like it, but that's the way it's > been done. Was this change intentional or accidental? > > Otherwise, I'm impressed by how good the new version is - so is my > partner who uses Windows and is envious... Please clarify so we are sure to understand what you are doing exactly. > Thanks > Girts Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
