On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:55 AM, <darkta...@911networks.com> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:10:47 +0300 > Roman Lebedev <lebedev...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:02 PM, <darkta...@911networks.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is it out? no mention on the darktable/news but it's up on >>> Archlinux >>> >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/darktable/ >>> and >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/darktable/ >> >>Same as any other odd numbered 'release' - 1.7.0, 1.5.0, etc. >>They are either just clueless and don't bother checking, or ... > > Since I'm getting my updates from arch, this means that I will need > to remove DT from arch and install it myself from source. > > Should I delete everything with darktable in the name except > for ./config/darktable and keep my db? > > or use pacman to remove darktable, then compile it myself?
i have no idea about the arch packaging. but 2.1.x is our unstable series and the number we display to signify that this is an unreleased version built from a git snapshot that is newer than the released stable series 2.0.x (next stable will be 2.2.x). so if your arch package means it is a snapshot from git, it may be just fine. -jo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
