On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus <h...@gmx.de> wrote: > Well, we had that, but the problem wasn't old .so in the install directory but > that someone removed a module without bumping the api version. If that was > done (I did it later to fix the problems) then the left over woud just be > ignored. But you are right, those things _can_ happen, so let me add another > case when it makes sense to delete build/ and the install dir: when strange > bugs occur. :-)
Those are two different things though. Deleting build/ requires recompiling and so is best avoided as it takes a long time. Deleting the install dir is really cheap so I just do it every time. make install is very fast and so is the rm so there's not much to be gained by avoiding them. > I personally do -j5 as I have 4 cores and find that to work best for me. If you mean on the x230 you only have 2 physical cores with 2 threads each, no? Last time I tested -j2 I think was almost as fast as it got on that setup but maybe you have a different CPU than me. Cheers, Pedro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
