Hi, On 10/16/07, Debajyoti Bera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What to do with our local changes to Mono.Data.SqliteClient ? I always > > > get confused with them. Dont even know what are those changes and why are > > > they there :-/ (it has something to with threading and locking) ? > > > > The work done locally was mainly for memory usage reasons. IIRC, the > > upstream bindings pull all of the results into memory at once, whereas > > our locally modified ones do so only as needed. I don't think > > threading/locking was ever an issue -- you might be confusing it with > > the fact that we couldn't use early sqlite 3.x versions because of > > broken policy in the library to that effect. > > Probably you are right. I still had to verify ... > beagle:/source=mind?query=sqlite+beagle+lock > returned nothing :-D > but google returned, > http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2005-November/015977.html > which mentions "Lock" ... yay! My faith in my memory is restored ;-)
Indeed you're right, but those changes did get merged upstream. So the memory usage I believe is the only outstanding reason. Joe _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
