Allright, thanks for the pointer!

I really like this codesnippet in Evolution.cs:

 "

                        foreach (string shit in crap)
                                folder_path = folder_path.Replace (shit, "");

"

:=)

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Joe Shaw <j...@joeshaw.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Joel Mandell <joelmand...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Would love to eventually fix the Evolution filter in Util/Evolution.cs. I
> > can send patches to dbera right?
>
> You can send patches to the list.  I think I wrote the Evolution stuff
> back in the day, so I might be able to remember some of the details.
> :)
>
> At this point there's nobody really maintaining it, and the current
> Evo stuff is old and broken so as long as you've tested it and feel
> good about the code, go ahead and push it AFAIAC.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> >
> > peace!
> > -joel m aka dikatlon
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Lukas Lipka <lukasli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
> >> best and fun projects to hack on!
> >>
> >> L.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joe Shaw <j...@joeshaw.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi Adam,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
> >> > <awill...@whitemice.org> wrote:
> >> >>> A major reason why I gave up on Beagle and
> >> >>> the whole Linux desktop itself was due to this attitude.  I guess
> the
> >> >>> developers of those apps are more thick skinned or resilient than I
> >> >>> was?  I don't know.
> >> >>
> >> >> Time is also probably a factor, Beagle was AFAIK really the first
> >> >> desktop Mono application of any note.  It was also ahead of its time
> as
> >> >> a concept [I recall no shortage of long rambling posts about how it
> was
> >> >> useless anyway].
> >> >
> >> > Indeed.  Writing a Mono application at the time was a... challenge.
> >> > Beagle surely had its own set of performance problems, and the tools
> >> > to profile and debug them were largely non-existent.  We even wrote a
> >> > few of them (heap-buddy, which has only recently been superseded by a
> >> > new built-in profiler).  I would have killed for a working debugger.
> >> > :)
> >> >
> >> > When Beagle was started, the concept was actually pretty clear to us.
> >> > We weren't looking to create a Spotlight for Linux (indeed, Beagle was
> >> > first publicly demoed on the day Apple announced Spotlight) -- it was
> >> > really designed as a means to an end: Dashboard needed an index to
> >> > make intelligent queries against and get contextual clues.  Beagle
> >> > really grew out of that need, and became a user-centric tool.
> >> >
> >> > Joe
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > dashboard-hackers mailing list
> >> > dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
> >> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dashboard-hackers mailing list
> >> dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Web:
> > http://www.openzource.org
> >
> > Cellphone:
> > 0722-137374
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dashboard-hackers mailing list
> > dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
> >
> >
>



-- 
*Web: *
http://www.openzource.org

*Cellphone: *
0722-137374
_______________________________________________
dashboard-hackers mailing list
dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers

Reply via email to