> >You are likely to hear lots of comments from people
> >explaining why they're not useful, and why there is no good reason for
> >InterBase to have them.
>
> I would be happy to debate that if anyone is game enough. :) Besides,
> they're good enough for Microsoft (SQL Server)...
Dont you mean: its was good enough for Sybase? MSSQL = Sybase for NT.
And no, I dont really want to debate it beyond that (anyone else is free to
tho :) ). I would expect IB to have TEMP tables, tho maybe with the
for select into do begin
end;
etc in the SP language it might not need them?
N
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Database List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
