>Dont you mean: its was good enough for Sybase? MSSQL = Sybase for NT.
Ok, so Microsoft would probably have left it out if they'd had to do it
themselves. <g>
>I would expect IB to have TEMP tables, tho maybe with the
>
>for select into do begin
>end;
>
>etc in the SP language it might not need them?
If nothing else, it's a bit of a drag having to create a stored procedure
when you just want to store some interim results between selects (eg. when
reporting).
Cheers,
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: Nic Wise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 5 May 2000 1:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list database
Subject: RE: [DUG-DB]: Does Interbase have temporary tables? (novice
question)
> >You are likely to hear lots of comments from people
> >explaining why they're not useful, and why there is no good reason for
> >InterBase to have them.
>
> I would be happy to debate that if anyone is game enough. :) Besides,
> they're good enough for Microsoft (SQL Server)...
Dont you mean: its was good enough for Sybase? MSSQL = Sybase for NT.
And no, I dont really want to debate it beyond that (anyone else is free to
tho :) ). I would expect IB to have TEMP tables, tho maybe with the
for select into do begin
end;
etc in the SP language it might not need them?
N
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Database List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Database List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
