I see what you're saying, certainly makes sense from that point of view. I might see if I get some spare time tomorrow and take a run at it.
On Jan 13, 5:23 pm, Michael Klishin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13.01.2009, at 20:08, heda wrote: > > > Syntactically speaking though, what do you think as an extension for > > dm-types? (if the counterpart changes could be made in dm-migrations) > > DSLish part is fine with me, I just think that it should be a module > that dm-migrations include into DataMapper::Type. > > MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
