Jacques, > Is :child_key broken on 0.10, or was I just using it wrong? Seems like > this should be valid syntax for the through relationship (though > redundant):
It's actually not a valid argument to a m:m relationship, and I should probably throw an exception when it is provided. The :through and :via options are what specify the relationships the m:m relationship "piggybacks" on top of, and they have their own child_key properties. Since a m:m relationships really is a composition of 2 (or more) relationships, I wasn't sure which of them the :child_key option would actually apply to. -- Dan (dkubb) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
