Ah ok, that makes sense. I do think throwing a specific exception here would be a good idea to make things a bit more clear to people who run into this.
Thanks On Sep 24, 11:41 am, "Dan Kubb (dkubb)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacques, > > > Is :child_key broken on 0.10, or was I just using it wrong? Seems like > > this should be valid syntax for the through relationship (though > > redundant): > > It's actually not a valid argument to a m:m relationship, and I should > probably throw an exception when it is provided. > > The :through and :via options are what specify the relationships the > m:m relationship "piggybacks" on top of, and they have their own > child_key properties. Since a m:m relationships really is a > composition of 2 (or more) relationships, I wasn't sure which of them > the :child_key option would actually apply to. > > -- > > Dan > (dkubb) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
