We just updated our code to the latest DM and were happy when we got everything passing spec. However our spec did not test existing data in our system.
It turns out that when an old HABTM join between Bar and Foo :through=>Resource would use a table bars_foos, the new DM uses a table bar_foos. >From browsing the code, it looks like this change is intended mostly out of simplicity of code? Good news is it wasn't hard to RENAME TABLE bars_foos TO bar_foos. Anyway, heads up for anyone else! -Gary --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
