Thanks! I just ran into precisely this issue myself. Mark.
On Oct 10, 12:13 pm, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > We just updated our code to the latest DM and were happy when we got > everything passing spec. > However our spec did not test existing data in our system. > > It turns out that when an old HABTM join between Bar and > Foo :through=>Resource would use a table bars_foos, the new DM uses a > table bar_foos. > > From browsing the code, it looks like this change is intended mostly > out of simplicity of code? > > Good news is it wasn't hard to RENAME TABLE bars_foos TO bar_foos. > > Anyway, heads up for anyone else! > > -Gary --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
