I agree that some documentation would be extremely useful -- hard for others to use this without being able to explain how it was created or verify the process. Eric
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Shekhar Krishnan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Eric, the back story is complicated if you need to know. Else just use > and > > > > I think it's very useful to know how the data was compiled (sources, > methodology, etc) so there can be some independent verification of its > accuracy. It would also be instructional for others trying to do > similar things. :) > > Cheers, > > -- > ~Nirbheek Chauhan > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
