Images seem to have been lost. Attaching them.
Distribution for states.  

[image: pm1.PNG]I
22 rows which probably have sub-category mislabeled? 
[image: pm2.PNG]

On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 9:27:56 AM UTC-5 Pratap Vardhan wrote:

> Thanks Nisar, that's useful to know. I'll update the repo with these 
> pointers. 
> What frequency for updates would you suggest (monthly or)? If you prefer, 
> we can move the repo to datameet org or any other widely accessible one and 
> collectively edit it.  
> So, what I meant about coordinates data is, some rows are blank and some 
> have coordinates but beyond India's extent bounds. I guess they will get 
> fixed with updates too.
> Here's the distribution for states.
>
> Separately, minor issue perhaps - there are 22 rows which probably have 
> sub-category mislabeled.
>  
> Thanks for the details!
> On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 12:47:59 AM UTC-5 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> Really beautiful!  
>>
>> I'll answer some of the queries you raised on the tweet thread here for 
>> everyone. 
>>
>> You've commented that the data in UK, HP & Nagaland appears erroneous. I 
>> am assuming because the lat/long is missing. It is so because these states 
>> are still doing the survey and haven't completed. They may complete it in 
>> the next few months. Many of the other NE states are also in a similar 
>> position. Goa and most UTs haven't been onboarded to the scheme yet. For 
>> the same reason, I would point people towards to original dataset or put in 
>> a system to update your GH repos regularly.
>>
>> Apart from that - I'll re-iterate that the data was collected by 
>> government rural engineers at the block level. Intention, accuracy and even 
>> understanding of definitions will vary across blocks/districts and 
>> especially states. The data serves its primary purpose with these 
>> assumptions but may lead to misleading statistics if treated as a census 
>> for cross-geography comparisons. 
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 27 November 2020 at 10:50:23 UTC+5:30 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> I've pulled states csvs to this repo 
>>> https://github.com/pratapvardhan/rural-facilities-pmgsy. Consolidated 
>>> India csv is at 
>>> https://www.kaggle.com/pratapvardhan/770k-geotagged-rural-facilities-in-india-pmgsy
>>> And, posted a thread of couple of visuals and minor data issues here 
>>> https://twitter.com/PratapVardhan/status/1332174593877020673
>>> Would love to hear if you use this data to create something.
>>>
>>> On Monday, November 23, 2020 at 2:05:47 AM UTC-5 Arun Ganesh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wonderful Harsh, its amazing to see such rural spatial datasets opened 
>>>> by the government. The OpenStreetMap India community is looking into the 
>>>> data to better get a sense of the quality to see how it could be 
>>>> integrated 
>>>> with the existing OSM basemap.
>>>>
>>>> As a sample have made an interactive map of just the Kerala data if 
>>>> anyone wants to explore: 
>>>> https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/planemad/ckhrbz1o6038o19piti441hd7.html?fresh=true&title=copy&access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoicGxhbmVtYWQiLCJhIjoiemdYSVVLRSJ9.g3lbg_eN0kztmsfIPxa9MQ#10.53/9.6726/76.524
>>>>
>>>> The dataset points are in yellow, the rest are from OSM. Some initial 
>>>> evaluations in Kerala and Karnataka suggest that the data is pretty good 
>>>> and spatially accurate within 100m.
>>>>
>>>

-- 
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about 
us by visiting http://datameet.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/datameet/c71a2201-b94d-4107-97c8-0ebd9baa76d0n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to