Then I'd use Don's approach.
On Sat September 9 2006 11:00, Michael Iannantuoni wrote: > This is not a problem as all dates are considered to start at the > beginning of the month, hence the date format DMDY99/9999. > > Michael > > Ralph Alvy wrote: > >Don's solution seems much more accurate. But there's always the problem of > >where in the month each date is. Consider these two dates: > > > >Jan 28 2000 > >Mar 01 2000 > > > >Well, they're only 1 month and a few days apart. Do you want that to be > >counted as 2 months or 1 month? I think on Don's scheme, the above > >separation between dates will be 2 months, and on mine, 1 month. I think. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Dataperf mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf > > _______________________________________________ > Dataperf mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf _______________________________________________ Dataperf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
