Hi Robert,

I agree with Don, 300Mb of data and indexes is a relatively small database,  
and on a standalone machine reindexing might only take a very short space of 
time...  Over a slow network might be a littloe too much, but if it is on a 
network server, it night be easier to copy it off, reindex and text the renamed 
database and then upload it to the server.

Hi Don,

290Mb Index is a big index !!!    Whenever I find myself with big indexes I use 
the Dpdiag utility to check if anything is redundant. Not only do large indexes 
consume time with reindexing, but they also consume time when writing data, and 
so removing unused indexes improves performance. (by default Microsoft Access 
Indexes every fieldname with the letters "id" or "no" in it, and often at the 
end of a development cycle I find that a relatively large percentage of my 
database are these useless indexes, and trimming them our demonstrably improves 
data save times.)

Regards
Brian



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Don Friedman 
  To: Dataperfect Users Discussion Group 
  Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [Dataperf] Importing STE w/o re-generating indexes


  Robert - glad all is well with you. 

  A big clean might be a good thing to do right after you change the names. It 
dusts off the cobwebs and with today's machines hardly takes much time. I also 
have large databases - one county's index is 290Meg - but if I start 
regenerating before I leave the office in the early evening it is done when I 
come back in the morning. Not a problem.


  Don Friedman
  Pittsburgh


  On Feb 16, 2008 4:21 PM, Robert Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    Dear Friends,

    I are renaming a database, so will be using WP 5.1+  search and replace in 
the .STE file, but will not otherwise be making any changes.

    I seem to remember there is a startup option to tell DP not to recreate all 
the indexes and running DPIMP. Since the databases has 99 panels, and about 300 
megabytes in total data & index files, with a good number of panels having 10 
or more indexes, si I am not enthisiastic about waiting for the whole database 
to be reindexed

    Btw, although I have not been active on this list I am continuing to grow 
my database work, with much of it generated content for TiddlyWiki sites I have 
developed.  See www.ngo-framework.net for the most recent site, that has now 
become the interim official web site for a major UN/NGO conference in September 
in Paris, preparing for the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of 
Human Rights, and with the tentative theme: Dignity, Integrity & Justice for 
All of Us: Being the change we want to see.

    In conjunction my role as Co-Chair of the Research, Communications & 
Website Sub-Committee for the Conference Planning Committee, I am renaming my 
database UDHR60 and will be dedicating its use as the digital engine for the 
conference  preparations, participation & follow-up.

    Please don't be surprised if I am around asking some questions - including 
exploring ways to better integrate the genius of DP with that of TiddlyWiki

    With warm regard

    Robert


    _______________________________________________
    Dataperf mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf





  -- 
  Don Friedman
  ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
  PRS Data Systems
  205 S Main Street
  Pittsburgh, PA   15215
  412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE 
  412-784-1615 Fax 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Dataperf mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to