Thank Brian that's the solution, change date format
regards
Juan Antonio Salhus


--- El lun, 16/2/09, Brian Hancock <[email protected]> escribió:

> De: Brian Hancock <[email protected]>
> Asunto: RE: [Dataperf] Bug in Export Import LOG
> Para: "'Dataperfect Users Discussion Group'" <[email protected]>
> Fecha: lunes, 16 febrero, 2009 3:23
> Hi Juan,
> 
> Well I'll be. 
> 
> It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the order
> of the date, it just
> when you have the letter formatted date fields eg
> DDD/MM/YYYY or DMM/DD/YYYY
> then the Shift-F9 Import Transaction Log does not correctly
> import the Date
> field. 
> 
> Fortunately, the Export T-Log is created exactly the same
> as when you use
> DDD/MM/YYYY or DDMY99/99/9999, so fortunately if you notice
> the problem you
> can change the data field from DDD/MM/YYYY to
> DDMY99/99/9999 and the import
> works fine again.
> 
> Everything seems fine for the Shift-F7 Built in Short
> Reports export and
> CTRL-F5 import of WP format files, whichever date format
> you use.
> 
> I have never used the DDD/MM/YYYY format, they introduced
> it after I had
> already gotten used to the DDMY99/99/9999 and fortuitously
> in this case it
> is hard to teach old dogs new tricks; fortuitously because
> these days I only
> generally interact with DP applications via T-Logs for web
> apps.
> 
> Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juan
> A. Salhus R.
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 2:44 AM
> To: Dataperfect Users Discussion Group
> Subject: [Dataperf] Bug in Export Import LOG
> 
> 
> In Chile, (SudAmerica) we use the data field like DDMMYYYY.
> When i define a field as DD/MM/YYYY in a panel they work
> fine
> but when i export the data to a LOG for a big Clean the
> problem apears
> The process o export work but when i import the data the
> error is generated
> at the date field they no recognice the format DD/MM/YYYY.
> 
> The solution is change all date field as ddmyy99/99/9999
> but there many
> applications generated by this way
> regards
> Juan A. Salhus
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf



_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to