On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm on board with fold=0 and fold=1. I only hated "fold" when it was > False and True. Now we're indexing a theoretically unbounded sequence > of folds by an ordinal, which makes perfect sense - the later the > time, the larger the ordinal ;-) > Great! I'll let it simmer for a few days and start making the change in the PEP and the code. I don't think it will be right to call it a "flag" anymore. What will be the right word: a fold index?
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
