On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Alexander Belopolsky < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm on board with fold=0 and fold=1. I only hated "fold" when it was >> False and True. Now we're indexing a theoretically unbounded sequence >> of folds by an ordinal, which makes perfect sense - the later the >> time, the larger the ordinal ;-) >> > > Great! I'll let it simmer for a few days and start making the change in > the PEP and the code. > > I don't think it will be right to call it a "flag" anymore. What will be > the right word: a fold index? > As an added benefit, we can get rid of the "ambiguous time" tongue-twister and call those intervals "two-fold".
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
