On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:

> I thought that you all might be interested in this note that I
> received from Dr Reingold, author of Calendrical Calculations.

> [Ed Reingold wrote:]
> The code is not under GPL.  We make it freely available for
> non-commercial use, but want a formal licensing agreement for
> commercial use.  In the case of Perl, we'd be interested in doing
> what we did for Mathematica and Java: trade the license for code
> that we could distribute.

If I'm reading that right, it means this:

"We'll give you the license to implement the algorithms if you'll
give us code we can publish."

That *should* mean that we can GPL/Artistic license our code that
implements their algorithms. Am I reading that right?

srl
-- 
Shane R. Landrum         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we generate our own light to compensate for the lack of light from above -AD
GPG public key: http://cs.smith.edu/~slandrum/srl_pgpkey.txt

Reply via email to