On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, srl wrote:
>
> > Rich Bowen emailed them at one point and got an agreement from them
> > that he could implement the algorithms and release the code freely,
> > as long as he let them publish the code in the next version of the
> > book. Last I heard, he was confirming that understanding with
> > them.
>
> Oh yeah, he did say that, didn't he?  If that could be extended from Rich
> to "anyone working on the Perl DateTime" project, then we'd be all set.
> Though I still think that either their license should be reworded (cause
> it doesn't reflect their intent) or their intent is _evil_ (if the license
> really means what I think it means).

I've not yet received a response from R&D about this. I will send
another note.

-- 
Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me.
Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees.

Reply via email to