* Dave Rolsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Mar 2003 11:27]: [...] > then the code will throw an exception, because there is no local 2:00 > AM on 2003-04-06 in the America/Chicago time zone.
What happens with the other direction? i.e. where the same hour exists twice successively. > Is that acceptable? I can't think of any good solutions to this, > other than documenting it. It sounds good to me. But then, I don't tend to deal with times at that time of night. cheers, -- Iain.
