On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Iain 'Spoon' Truskett wrote: > * Dave Rolsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Mar 2003 11:27]: > > [...] > > then the code will throw an exception, because there is no local 2:00 > > AM on 2003-04-06 in the America/Chicago time zone. > > What happens with the other direction? i.e. where the same hour exists > twice successively.
"First" wins, where first is defined as "earliest UTC datetime". -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
