Abigail schreef:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:46:10PM +0200, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
> > 
> > 2) If you want to use the Mayan calendar *now*, as a replacement for the
> > Gregorian calendar, you also need a time system. And 'our' system is the
> > only sensible candidate. (Unless the Mayan time system is known?)
> 
> 
> You lost me on the "you also need a time system". Why?

If you want to replace DateTime with DateTime::Calendar::Mayan, you want
to have at least comparable functionality. If you want your server logs,
or your diary, or your system clock, to show Mayan dates, you also want
to include a time.

Perhaps I should have said: "If I want to use the Mayan calendar
*now*, as a replacement for the Gregorian calendar, I also want a time
system."?

(I accept that it would be _wrong_ to include a time. But that doesn't
mean it isn't right!)

Eugene

Reply via email to