On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Claus F�rber wrote: > Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote: > >> OTOH, maybe I dont understand how your DateTime->hires( 1 ) call > >> would work without adding HiRes as a dependency. > > > It does - ... > > IMO no DateTime::* module should depend on Time or Date modules outside > of that namespace. DT should replace them eventually. > > Maybe DateTime::Hires as a replacement for Time::HiRes?
Um, what would it do differently? Are you really proposing to implement the same functionality as Time::HiRes in a new namespace? That just seems silly. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
