> > I take it back.  I thought we'd have now() and hires_now().  I think
> > having nanosecond at 0 makes sense to most people.
>
> We have an awful lot of constructors already.  Maybe we should put this into another 
> package?

The more I think about this the more I like it.  We'll only have to commit the 
fractional seconds fix to DateTime.pm.  I'd suggest DateTime::HiRes.pm to be included 
with the DT distribution.  The down side is this functionality wouldn't be available 
to decorators unless DateTime::HiRes was a subclass of DT.

-J

--

Reply via email to