> > So are we back to DT::HiRes?  Or just rename the constructor?  I would
> > like to see this functionality make it into the next release.
>
> I guess sticking it in a separate module DateTime::HiRes works, since that
> way we don't force people to load Time::HiRes if they don't need it.

What about using 'require Time::HiRes' inside the hires constructor?  My thinking is 
since we already have hires_epoch() in the DT namespace we might as well have 
hires_now() there too.

-J

--

Reply via email to