> On the one hand, I agree. "HiRes" is bad, and "hires" is a bit worse. > OTOH, _so_ many people are already familiar with Time::HiRes, that having > our own variation on it may be confusing to as many people, or more, as > "hires" is.
So are we back to DT::HiRes? Or just rename the constructor? I would like to see this functionality make it into the next release. -J --
