On 6/15/05, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I think we may need to consider serious backwards incompatibility in > the future of DateTime.pm (possibly via a new namespace like DateTime2) to > really clean this up, but that'll wait til I'm less tired ;)
Just break it. DateTime's nowhere near version 1.0. Anyone who was relying on its API stability was not doing so based on any "official" advice, AFAIK. -John
