Dave Rolsky wrote:
It sounded like people were interested. And maybe it's a "if you build
it they will come" thing ;)
Anyway, go for it and let's brainstorm on a better namespace. Here's
some thoughts:
At the risk of sounding flippant, why not rename the existing DateTime class to
DateTime::Fat (or the less inflamatory DateTime::Base) and put the proposed
module in it's place as DateTime. If it is designed well, everything should
Just Work(TM) with the shim class, which should always be faster than the
existing class, even with the extra dispatch to plump up the object when needed.
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
