Le mercredi 01 février 2017 à 14:46 -0600, Dave Rolsky a écrit : > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Jean Forget wrote: > > > As a comparison, with DateTime::Locale, there is a register() > > function to hide the internals. Is it possible to have a similar > > function in a future version of DateTime::TimeZone > > so we will be immune to changes of the internals? > > Sorry I never responded to this. I think I just forgot. > > So yes, I could imagine something similar. That said, the Locale > registration system is kind of a pain to maintain and I had to bend over a > bit backwards when I reworked how the internals of the Locale code worked. > So forget about the register function.
> > Meanwhile, I have updated DateTime::TimeZone::LMT to use the proper > > version of the internals, depending on the version of > > DateTime::TimeZone. I can release a working version as soon as I get a > > commit bit and a round tuit. > > To what do you need a commit bit? > I need a commit bit to DT::TZ::LMT. I received it from Rick M and I released a new version of this module the next day. So this question is closed. Or nearly closed. I have received a git pull request from Karen Etheridge for a few improvements on Makefile.PL. I was waiting for bigger mistakes to fix and release a new version to CPAN. And actually, I forgot about Karen's improvements. Now, maybe I will release a new version with just Karen's improvements. See: https://github.com/jforget/DateTime-TimeZone-LMT/pull/1 > > Cheers, > > Dave Rolsky > http://blog.urth.org > https://github.com/autarch Thank you for your interest, Jean Forget
