On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, [iso-8859-1] S�nke Ruempler wrote: > > hi, > > i suggested to change the filtering in that way, that the filter would be > executed in the last step (if mail will be dropped into local mailbox or > will be redirected to _external_ account (to avoid that the filter would be > executed 2 or more times). > > davide wrote: > > >I could describe my logic as "optimize for 99% of cases avoiding >to bloat > >the source code to make happy the remaining 1%". Again, guess >who's the > >only one that noticed it.
Look i'm a patient guy but when i say something i use to mind it. Please do not piss me off. > why should that bloat the code? i think you just have to add the filter code > at another place? Code bloating does not happen by adding 5000 lines of code alltogether, it happens by adding a small amount of lines for multiple times to add feature that noone% is going to use. I still don't fscking understand why the hell, among thousands of users, only you need this feature. You want a more complex filtering ? Simply put a filter/.tab file and code your filter subsystem externally by handling all the fscking cases that you're going to issue. > ps: as i said a little time before, i dont want to nerv you, xmail ist > great, i just want to help to improve it in the details. I said you and i explained to you at least four times, and actually i made you a favor by explaining it just one time. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
