Hi Lloyd, > Personally, I am more interested in SOURCE portability than executable > portability. My development tools are written in C or CPP - these are the > gold standard of Linux. > > I have seen little that .NET offers that provides anything at this low a > level. Frankly, downloaders are trivial programs to write in C or CPP. >
I agree that .NET is not the best possible language for low level development. The other two DVFlasher replacement candidates use C and kermit. Either of them can be used as basis for BOOTME & BOOTMMS rewrite. Which one do you prefer? Why? > My two cents... > Thanks for experessing your opinion. It'd be great if you can also give some feedback about the other sides of UBL/Host tools. BR, Ivan _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
