On Tuesday 11 September 2007 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Kermit allows to write scripts. Scripts are good for automation. It is OK > to use whatever you want to program ONE board. But if you have a whole > bunch of them and must not only download a bootloader but program each > board with U-Boot, kernel, filesystem, test each board, personalize it and > register somewhere in database you will need something like kermit. Another > alternative is send/expect but it is bigger that kermit, not that flexible > and lacks a lot of kermit's features and niceties.
As we are doing that very thing, we actually use a product called PEEDI (www.ronetix.com). It is far better for production runs than using Kermit. As for personalizing it, we wrote some specialized code to do so. Production runs require more cost effective methods than serial bootloaders. Cheers, Lloyd _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
