Troy, Sorry for the late response.
It is a bug in the current git tree. The cpu is decided based on the system_rev variable and it is being compared with 6446 (Refer to arch/arm/mach-davinci/id.c for details). So in the current tree, the function cpu_is_davinci_dm6443 will never be true. Regards, Sudhakar ________________________________________ From: Troy Kisky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:48 AM To: Rajashekhara, Sudhakar Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: DaVinci: replace dm6443 with dm644x Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > Description: > Replaces occurrences of dm6443 with dm644x. > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/cpu.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/cpu.h > b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/cpu.h > index c7d190b..2f8ce78 100644 > --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/cpu.h > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/cpu.h > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static inline int cpu_is_davinci_dm ##type (void) \ > } > > /* following generates the cpu_is_davinci_dmxxx */ > -IS_DAVINCI_CPU(6443, 0x6443) /* cpu_is_davinci_dm6443() */ > +IS_DAVINCI_CPU(644x, 0x6446) /* cpu_is_davinci_dm644x() */ > IS_DAVINCI_CPU(6467, 0x6467) /* cpu_is_davinci_dm6467() */ > IS_DAVINCI_CPU(350, 0x350) /* cpu_is_davinci_dm350() */ > I don't understand how this works. It looks like a 6443 will now fail a cpu_is_davinci_dm644x() test. Troy_______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
