Steve,

Were you trying to patch the Beta kernel with patches from "patch level 14 
release"? You may have missed the LSP 1.20 GA release. The patches from "Patch 
level 14 release" cleanly apply to the LSP 1.20 GA kernel. The default series 
file picks patches 1, 9 - 14. The patches 2 - 8 are for the custom MMC/SD stack.

LSP 1.20, with patch level 14, we have reported the following -

USB MSC Host Read: 6.4 MBytes/sec
USB MSC Host Write: 6.3 MBytes/sec

The procedure followed to measure the performance is documented in the 
datasheet - http://focus.ti.com/lit/an/sprs496a/sprs496a.pdf

BTW, we also have a LSP 2.00 Beta release, which is based on MV Pro 5.0.0 
(2.6.18) on the software update advisor site. USB MSC Host performance has 
improved with this release:
 
USB MSC Host Read: 13.4 MBytes/sec
USB MSC Host Write: 7.3 MBytes/sec

Thanks
Sneha
________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Berry
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:14 PM
To: [email protected]; Subbrathnam, Swaminathan
Subject: USB patches (patch level 14) for LSP 1_20


I'm running into a performance issue with using USB memory sticks - namely very 
low write performance. I've recently ported to LSP 1_20 (from the beta) and 
after searching the mailing list there seemed to be some mention of a patch 
level 45 on the 6446 that would fix this issue...

But of course for the Dm355 distribution on the Ti update site, patch level 14 
is the current one. And to top it off, they don't apply cleanly with quilt.

So before I go through each patch individually I'd like to make sure that these 
patches will help with my problem. Most of the comments seem to be relating to 
OTG functionality - but the patch labeled 
lsp_1_20_usb_intr_schedule_fix_014.patch - sounds like it could be helpful.

Any help is appreciated,

    Steve
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to